Pro Football weekly

Comment | Print |

Jones-Drew unlikely to receive extension

About the Author

Recent posts by Arthur Arkush

Colts add OT Cherilus, CB Toler

Posted March 12, 2013 @ 5:31 p.m.

Bills bring back McKelvin

Posted March 09, 2013 @ 1:45 p.m.

Saints re-sign Galette

Posted March 09, 2013 @ 1:31 p.m.

Steelers part ways with OLB Harrison

Posted March 09, 2013 @ 12:40 p.m.

SS Moore is staying with the Falcons

Posted March 09, 2013 @ 9:36 a.m.

Related Stories

2013 NFL draft order

Posted April 25, 2013 @ 12:46 p.m.

2013 NFC free-agent moves, by team

Posted April 15, 2013 @ 12:21 p.m.

2013 AFC free-agent moves, by team

Posted April 15, 2013 @ 12:21 p.m.

Warmack, Cooper scouting reports

Posted April 15, 2013 @ 11:02 a.m.

Elam, Vaccaro scouting reports

Posted April 12, 2013 @ 9:26 a.m.

Milliner, Mathieu scouting reports

Posted April 11, 2013 @ 1:48 p.m.

Te'o, Ogletree scouting reports

Posted April 10, 2013 @ 12:57 p.m.

Lotulelei, Werner scouting reports

Posted April 09, 2013 @ 3:13 p.m.

Joeckel, Long scouting reports

Posted April 08, 2013 @ 11:35 a.m.

2013 preseason schedule

Posted April 04, 2013 @ 4:07 p.m.
Posted May 24, 2012 @ 12:27 p.m. ET
By Arthur Arkush

Maurice Jones-Drew is unhappy about his contract, and he is staying away from Jaguars offseason team activities to show his displeasure with the five-year deal he signed prior to the 2009 campaign.

Our sources in North Florida tell PFW the contract extension that Jones-Drew is pining for isn’t coming anytime soon.

Jones-Drew, the 2011 NFL rushing champion, has yet to say publicly that his absence from OTAs is because he wants an extension; rather that information was revealed by head coach Mike Mularkey last week. Word is Jones-Drew likely will join his teammates June 12 for mandatory minicamp to avoid having his salary docked. We’re also hearing that Jones-Drew is likely to downplay his absence, pointing to his preference to work out in his home state of California during the offseason rather than as a sign of unhappiness about his current deal.

The biggest question, we hear, regarding the Jones-Drew situation isn’t whether the Jaguars, who control his rights for the next two years, will offer him an extension — it is what type of presence will Jones-Drew be once he joins the team this summer.

One source close to the situation recalled the 2008 season, when Jones-Drew’s former teammate, LB Mike Peterson, tried — unsuccessfuly — to leverage a new deal in training camp, only to carry his unhappiness into the season and become a distraction. Peterson was at odds with former head coach Jack Del Rio, eventually being benched by Del Rio for insubordination. The source didn’t suggest Jones-Drew could be a similar problem — rather stressing the importance of avoiding a similar situation, particularly because Mularkey needs his best player to be a positive influence as the coach begins to create a new working environment for the club.

The source also mentioned Jones-Drew’s conditioning as something to monitor. Prior to his career year last season, Jones-Drew showed up in terrific shape coming off the lockout and offseason knee surgery last year. But in 2010, Jones-Drew was not in the best shape when he arrived for offseason work and ended up suffering an injury during training camp.

Comments ()