Pro Football weekly

Comment | Print |

Bengals' ground game off-stride

About the Author

Recent posts by Mike Wilkening

Underdogs have made some noise in title round

Posted Jan. 14, 2013 @ 2:36 p.m.

What's next for Browns' offense?

Posted Jan. 11, 2013 @ 9:59 p.m.

Running back a need for Lions

Posted Jan. 11, 2013 @ 9:52 p.m.

Divisional round handicapping column

Posted Jan. 11, 2013 @ 4:05 p.m.

Related Stories

Browns strike early, sign Kruger

Posted March 12, 2013 @ 5:23 p.m.

Cincinnati Bengals: 2013 team needs

Posted March 07, 2013 @ 12:50 p.m.

Bengals DE Johnson receives franchise tag

Posted March 01, 2013 @ 1:52 p.m.

Bengals name Hue Jackson RB coach

Posted Feb. 06, 2013 @ 11:51 a.m.

LB Brandon Joiner joins Bengals after prison term

Posted Feb. 04, 2013 @ 7:09 p.m.

Bengals sign OLB Maybin

Posted Jan. 25, 2013 @ 1:04 p.m.

Turner should benefit Browns RB Richardson

Posted Jan. 18, 2013 @ 11:54 a.m.

Running back a need for Lions

Posted Jan. 11, 2013 @ 9:52 p.m.

Key matchup: Ravens WRs vs. Broncos pass defense

Posted Jan. 10, 2013 @ 2:32 p.m.
Posted Oct. 07, 2010 @ 11:53 a.m. ET
By Mike Wilkening

Through one-quarter of the season, the Bengals were still searching for answers for their running game. Entering Week Five, the Bengals' longest run was 13 yards, and the club was averaging 3.3 yards per rush, and this with its entire starting offensive line and the top two tailbacks (Cedric Benson and Bernard Scott) returning from a ground game that ranked ninth last season. Also, the Bengals were on pace for 61 fewer carries than a season ago, with greater emphasis on the passing game. Interestingly enough, the running game showed signs of life Week Four at Cleveland when the offense went to the no-huddle in the second half, with Benson racking up three rushes of 10 yards or more in eight carries. But Lewis, leading up to Week Five, indicated that the no-huddle limits the Bengals' options on offense and takes practice time to perfect, making for a tough risk-reward decision. 


Comments ()