Pro Football weekly

Comment | Print |

Lions' pass on Haynesworth no surprise

About the Author

Recent posts by Eric Edholm

Reese: Giants' Tuck wants to regain form

Posted Feb. 23, 2013 @ 11:26 a.m.

Chiefs' Dorsey eyes '333 players' for first pick

Posted Feb. 22, 2013 @ 4:33 p.m.

Caldwell might be starting fresh in Jacksonville

Posted Feb. 22, 2013 @ 2:17 p.m.

Related Stories

TE Davis gets deal to stay with Redskins

Posted March 29, 2013 @ 3:48 p.m.

RG3: 'I'll be ready'

Posted March 12, 2013 @ 5:04 p.m.

Redskins release CB Hall

Posted March 11, 2013 @ 3:33 p.m.

Redskins lock up TE Paulsen

Posted March 09, 2013 @ 1:16 p.m.

Washington Redskins: 2013 team needs

Posted March 08, 2013 @ 9:54 p.m.

Detroit Lions: 2013 team needs

Posted March 07, 2013 @ 4:22 p.m.

Lions re-sign LB Levy

Posted March 06, 2013 @ 12:59 p.m.

Redskins hire A.J. Smith as senior executive

Posted March 06, 2013 @ 11:06 a.m.

Lions re-sign OT Hilliard

Posted March 01, 2013 @ 12:05 p.m.
Posted July 02, 2010 @ 11:53 a.m. ET
By Eric Edholm

The Lions made it public that they have no intention of dealing for DT Albert Haynesworth, and though they seriously considered it, our sources say the team never got to the point where it was even discussing what it might offer for the disgruntled Redskin. Although Lions head coach Jim Schwartz had a relationship with Haynesworth and believed he could tap into the tackle's talent in Detroit, Lions brass felt that the potential distraction — especially with No. 2 overall pick Ndamukong Suh playing the same position — was not worth the gamble. The Lions are not teeming with depth at the position and could use another front-line player to join a top-three rotation of Suh, Corey Williams and Sammie Hill. But they felt that a deal for Haynesworth, even if they were getting him cheaply, just wasn't worth the hassle and the distraction.


For authoritative coverage and analysis of NFL news, free agency and fantasy football, visit

Comments ()