Pro Football weekly

Comment | Print |

Shanahan: 'Let's not talk about' Portis

About the Author

Recent posts by Eric Edholm

Reese: Giants' Tuck wants to regain form

Posted Feb. 23, 2013 @ 11:26 a.m.

Chiefs' Dorsey eyes '333 players' for first pick

Posted Feb. 22, 2013 @ 4:33 p.m.

Caldwell might be starting fresh in Jacksonville

Posted Feb. 22, 2013 @ 2:17 p.m.

Related Stories

TE Davis gets deal to stay with Redskins

Posted March 29, 2013 @ 3:48 p.m.

RG3: 'I'll be ready'

Posted March 12, 2013 @ 5:04 p.m.

Redskins release CB Hall

Posted March 11, 2013 @ 3:33 p.m.

Redskins lock up TE Paulsen

Posted March 09, 2013 @ 1:16 p.m.

Washington Redskins: 2013 team needs

Posted March 08, 2013 @ 9:54 p.m.

Redskins hire A.J. Smith as senior executive

Posted March 06, 2013 @ 11:06 a.m.

Redskins' GM says team not considering name change

Posted Feb. 15, 2013 @ 10:39 a.m.

Redskins sign DT Brace

Posted Feb. 14, 2013 @ 10:54 a.m.

Is Canty a cap concern for Giants?

Posted Jan. 25, 2013 @ 9:59 p.m.
Posted Feb. 26, 2010 @ 3:05 p.m. ET
By Eric Edholm

INDIANAPOLIS — Redskins head coach Mike Shanahan didn't reveal much in his Combine talk with the media, personnel-wise, other than that the team will tender restricted free-agent QB Jason Campbell and expects to have him on the team next season.

On the subject of RB Clinton Portis, though, Shanahan was even less glib.

"Let's not talk about Clinton," Shanahan said. "Let's talk about everybody with the Washington Redskins. Let's not focus on one guy. I want everybody to be as good a football player as they can be. What it takes is a commitment to get better every day. I want all the guys on our football team to make a commitment in the offseason to work and work extremely hard. That's the only way we're going to get better as a team."

There has been heavy speculation that Portis will not be back, and Shanahan has done his best to fuel that speculation with relative silence. There was more of that Friday.


For the most authoritative NFL draft news and free-agency analysis, visit



Comments ()