Not Registered?

For Buffalo to commit to him, Vick has to prove he's starting QB material

About the Author

Recent posts by Michael Blunda

2010 looking like Chargers' last hurrah

Posted March 15, 2010 @ 10:07 a.m.

New ORT Green likely to start in Buffalo

Posted March 13, 2010 @ 10:30 p.m.

Cromartie had worn out welcome in San Diego

Posted March 12, 2010 @ 6:45 p.m.

Pioli, Haley both looking for improvement from Bowe

Posted March 07, 2010 @ 12:53 a.m.

Related Stories

Lynch's days in Buffalo may be numbered

Posted Feb. 05, 2010 @ 9:43 a.m.

Eagles likely will have McNabb back

Posted Feb. 04, 2010 @ 7:47 p.m.

Bills tab Edwards as defensive coordinator

Posted Feb. 04, 2010 @ 2:14 p.m.

Bills' inspiring offense challenged by injuries

Posted Sept. 21, 2009 @ 5:07 p.m.

Bills starting ORT Butler out for season

Posted Sept. 21, 2009 @ 1:53 p.m.

Reports: Eagles sign Garcia for QB insurance

Posted Sept. 14, 2009 @ 5:22 p.m.

Reid makes it official: Vick will play Thursday

Posted Aug. 25, 2009 @ 3:14 p.m.

Handicapping the chase for Vick

Posted July 27, 2009 @ 6:56 p.m.

Tasker deserves place in Hall of Fame

Posted July 20, 2009 @ 5:29 p.m.

Reeves: Vick should remain at QB

Posted July 20, 2009 @ 4:55 p.m.
Posted Nov. 09, 2009 @ 5:33 p.m.
By Michael Blunda

Michael Vick is currently a backup quarterback for the Eagles, playing under a two-year contract he signed this offseason. But could he be starting for the Bills in 2010? According to his mentor, former NFL head coach Tony Dungy, maybe.

Dungy, a commentator for NBC, spoke about Vick's future during Sunday's "Football Night in America" broadcast.

"I told Michael to just worry about this year," Dungy said. "It's technically up to Philadelphia. If they want him back, he has to stay there. If they don't, there are some teams looking for quarterbacks: Cleveland, St. Louis and Washington. But I think a dark horse is Buffalo. They talked originally. There was some communication there. I think that could be a good spot."

Vick, who has played infrequently this season, could become a free agent next year if the Eagles do not pick up his $5.2 million team option. Many clubs are likely to be looking for quarterbacks at that point, including Buffalo, which has received mostly poor play from Trent Edwards and Ryan Fitzpatrick this season.

The PFW spin

While a new starting quarterback taking snaps for the Bills next season seems like a more likely scenario with each passing week, it would take a lot for that man to be Vick.

In Buffalo, Edwards has been far from the franchise QB the Bills were hoping they had found. Virtually all of his numbers are down from last season, as he's completing just 59.5 percent of his throws with a 73.0 passer rating and 5-6 touchdown-interception ratio. His confidence is reportedly badly shaken, and he'll need to play very well in the second half of the season to have a realistic shot at sticking as Buffalo's starter in '10.

In Philadelphia, meanwhile, it's been a somewhat peculiar situation. Despite angering many fans by signing Vick, who had been released from prison just months earlier for running a dogfighting operation, the Eagles have barely played the former Pro Bowler. Expected to add a new dimension to the offense, Vick played just two snaps in Sunday-night's loss to the Cowboys and for the season has completed just 2-of-6 passes for six yards and run 12 times for 27 yards. Given his miniscule role and the fact that he would be owed big money if his option is picked up, Vick is very unlikely to be back in Philly next year.

For the Bills to have interest in Vick this offseason, though, the 29-year-old will have to prove that he still has what it takes to lead an NFL offense after sitting out two full seasons and seeing only rare game action during the current one. It would also take an offensive coordinator that's willing to cater his scheme to Vick's abilities. The Virginia Tech product was never a proficient passer — his career passer rating is 75.6, and his completion percentage is 53.7 — but he did major damage with his legs, gaining 7.2 yards per carry and rushing for 21 TDs. If Vick is going to be an every-down player, he'd have to be part of a non-conventional offense that allows him freedom to run often.

Also, while Vick might have had positive talks with Buffalo last summer, odds are there will be a different regime there come the offseason. With the team sitting at 3-5 with major issues on both sides of the ball, changes appear to be in the offing barring a dramatic turnaround. That means not only head coach Dick Jauron but also other members of the coaching staff and personnel department could be let go following the season. If that's the case, Vick and his people would be dealing with many new faces in Buffalo.

For the Bills to take a chance on a player like Vick, who could alienate some fans who have not forgiven him for his violent treatment of dogs, they'll have to be absolutely sure that he's the right man for the job. Although reactions to Vick were mixed on Monday among Bills players, S Donte Whitner, at least, believes that it's a gamble worth taking.

"I believe that Michael Vick would be a good fit, and I would encourage whoever to bring Michael Vick in," Whitner said, according to ESPN.com. A lot would still have to happen, though, for the Bills to be encouraged.

Comments (3)

Login!

Not Registered?

or Register!

STEVE PILATO
The numbers above on Vick tell what amounts to the whole story on him as an NFL QB. A career completion percentage of 53.7 tells you he is not an accurate passer, & his career rating of 75.6 confirms what a quick check of his career numbers indicate: As a quarterback, Vick is mediocre, nothing more. He's thrown 71 TD's against 52 interceptions. But the interesting stat is that he has been sacked 187 times. For a guy with Vick's escapability, that's way too high. It tells me he is either guilty of running around in the backfield trying to make something happen, or has difficulty in reading coverages & thusly holds on the the ball too long. As for that escapability that makes him so "special," he's 29 years old. That is going to go away sooner rather than later, which leaves him as what, a pocket quarterback? With those numbers? If you are the Buffalo Bills, or a Bills fan, one look at those numbers should tell you that Michael Vick would be essentially the same thing as Trent Edwards. That is not what the Bills need, or should want, unless they plan on Vick as another TO type box office bonanza that does nothing for them in the win column. While I have the utmost respect for Tony Dungy, as a Bills fan, I suggest that if he thinks Vick is such a bargain as a quarterback, he should return to coaching & have him as his own quarterback. As for the Bills, I can only hope they are being extremely diligent in evaluating the quarterbacks who will be available in this April's draft. They'd better be, because they need one. Desperately
Cardsfan81
This article is a waste of time and energy. It's strictly a bash Micheal Vick piece for those upset that Vick in is the league with the possisbility to hit pay dirt next year. When I read and here how Vick is a bad QB I just understand it for what it is. Kerry Collins 0-6, Mark Bulger 1-7, Shuan Hill (benched), Ryan Fitzpatrick (no arm), Derek Anderson (inconsistent), Brady Quinn (no arm), Jamarcus Russel (no brain), and Jake Delhomme (turn over machine) are QB's stinking or have stunk it up in the NFL as starters this season. Now that's bad QB play. The one thing that the above QB's all have in common is they all have great 'character.' The problem is that character doesn't win games; talent is what wins games. The respective fan bases of the above franchises are unhappy because of the poor QB play. Vick would be an upgrade over the previously mentioned QB's. Steve Pilato you really don't get it and to take a shot at Dungy and Vick tells me you are not taking a look at the QB play in the league objectively.
STEVE PILATO
Cardsfan81, if looking at Vick's numbers isn't looking at the issue objectively, please tell me what yardstick I should be using. I do not dispute the awful play of any of the quarterbacks you mention, however they are not the point here. The point is that measuring Michael Vick by his numbers as a quarterback, meaning as a passer, he is not the answer for a franchise looking for a quarterback of the future. As far as the character issue which you, not I raised, I never made a single mention of it. As far as I am concerned, that is water under the bridge, & not a relevant issue to the debate. Also, my comment regarding Mr. Dungy is not a shot at all, rather it is based upon his own stated opinion of Vick as a quarterback, which I do not share. Again, I base my evaluation of Michael Vick as a NFL quarterback by the numbers, & using those numbers as a measurement, I would not want him as my quarterback. As far as Tony Dungy, my bet is that we never see him coaching on an NFL sideline again. I think he has moved on to another phase of his life, which I heartily commend him for. However, if he were to change his mind, I'd love to see him on the sidelines in Buffalo coaching the Bills. But I would prefer to see him without Michael Vick as his quarterback. Talent at the quarterback position is important & does win games, you are correct. But Vick's numbers suggest only mediocrity, & mediocrity at the quarterback position will not win you games, only lose them.

Quick Links

Poll

Will Brady Quinn beat out Kyle Orton as Broncos' Week One starting QB?


Pro Football Weekly, LLC. | 302 Saunders Rd. Suite 100 Riverwoods, IL 60015 | (847) 940-1100
Copyrighted © 1998- by Pro Football Weekly, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.
Designated portions of this site © by STATS LLC. and/or Associated Press. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC and/or Associated Press is strictly prohibited.
Powered by Django