Not Registered?

Publisher's Pen

NFL franchise doesn't belong in London

About the Author

Hub Arkush

harkush@pfwmedia.com
Publisher and editor

Recent posts by Hub Arkush

Proposed OT rule change still not fair

Posted March 03, 2010 @ 11:24 a.m.

Proposed OT rule change still not fair

Posted March 03, 2010 @ 11:23 a.m.

Labor unrest talk of Super Bowl week

Posted Feb. 10, 2010 @ 12:11 p.m.

Team-first attitude makes Colts special

Posted Feb. 04, 2010 @ 3:25 p.m.

Team-first attitude makes Colts special

Posted Feb. 04, 2010 @ 3:26 p.m.

Related Stories

Labor topic dominates Goodell's annual address

Posted Feb. 05, 2010 @ 2:27 p.m.

Arkush: Cable's actions warrant suspension

Posted Nov. 14, 2009 @ 5:42 p.m.

Smith: Union, NFL not at odds over concussions

Posted Oct. 27, 2009 @ 5:43 p.m.

Owners set to discuss labor issues at fall meetings

Posted Oct. 12, 2009 @ 4:21 p.m.

Madden to serve NFL as special advisor

Posted Sept. 10, 2009 @ 11:54 a.m.

Blacked-out games to air locally on NFL.com

Posted Sept. 10, 2009 @ 11:28 a.m.

Goodell: Eagles’ Vick can play in Week Three

Posted Sept. 03, 2009 @ 4:39 p.m.

Vick conditionally reinstated

Posted July 27, 2009 @ 3:42 p.m.

Vick released from federal custody

Posted July 20, 2009 @ 11:41 a.m.

Vick, Burress deserve different fates

Posted July 09, 2009 @ 12:25 p.m.
Posted Oct. 29, 2009 @ 10:17 p.m.
By Hub Arkush

Speaking at a sports conference in London on the Friday before the Patriots met the Bucs in this year's version of the "NFL owners' excellent adventure," commissioner Roger Goodell said, "I expect that sometime in the next couple of years, we could be playing multiple games here. If we brought more than one game here, and it continues to have the same kind of enthusiasm and growth of interest, I think that is about as good of an indicator you can get that it could successfully support a franchise. And that's what we're looking at."

I like Goodell, and on balance, looking at his entire body of work over the last three seasons, I'd give him high marks. But this whole London thing troubles me to no end, because it shines a light on the one big problem I have with the NFL commissioner's office today.

Growing up in the '60s, I took great solace in the belief that Pete Rozelle's major responsibility was to use the broad powers of the commissioner's office to protect the sport we love and to put the best interests of the team owners, players and fans all on equal footing when making decisions to govern the game. Owners have always hired commissioners, but I've always hoped they'd do everything in their power to put the best interests of the game ahead of the owners' bank accounts.

It has often been written that Rozelle's and Paul Tagliabue's greatest talents were the ability to negotiate and martial the egos of the owners so as to always put the best interests of the whole ahead of the well-being of individuals. Under commissioner Goodell, it seems clear that he works for the 32 owners, and his main focus is to make their 32 football businesses as profitable as possible — period.

Last week we wrote in the editorial space of our print edition about our inability to understand why the commissioner and owners seem to think it is imperative to put a team back in Los Angeles after it failed to support its previous teams. The only possible benefit would be to drive more revenue for the 32 owners, while costing fans in a current NFL city their team.

The idea of asking eight or nine teams to travel to London every year is absurd, since obviously not all could be from the East Coast and not all could do it the week before their bye. But what about the eight or nine trips the London franchise would have to make to the U.S.? It's about as ridiculous and unfair to the players as anything I've ever heard.

Goodell has also said he'd prefer a London team to be a completely new franchise as opposed to moving an existing one, a nice way of not using the word "expansion." Many of us can't remember the last time the league had quite as many inept franchises as it does today, so now is a good time to expand?

And why is it London or other parts of England that Goodell has expressed fascination with? In the NFL's repeated failed efforts to operate American football leagues in Europe, Germany is the only country that repeatedly supported successful franchises. We actually now have a Hungarian-language version of Pro Football Weekly, and as many readers in France, Spain and other parts of Europe as Great Britain. So, why England?

Finally for now, and most intriguingly, how long will the courts allow the NFL's college draft and its restrictions on free agency to stand if it randomly dictates that the only opportunity to work for one out of every 33 or 34 players with less than 4-6 years of experience is to go live overseas? I haven't had the pleasure of meeting DeMaurice Smith yet, but that's a freebie for you, pal — you won't let them get away with that, will you? Especially since it serves absolutely no purpose other than to further line the pockets of the current 32 NFL team owners at the expense of both the players and existing fan base. At some point, enough is enough.

 

PFW has launched its brand-new NFL Draft Newsletter series, with the first issue now ready for mailing. Produced by PFW's player personnel department under the direction of Nolan Nawrocki, the series consists of four information-packed issues. For more info or to subscribe — click here for PDF e-pub or here for print format.

Comments (1)

Login!

Not Registered?

or Register!

ukbearfan
As a long-time NFL fan in England you'd expect me to disagree, but I couldn't agree more with you - a permanent franchise in the UK just isn't practical, and I'm not convinced there's enough support to sustain one, once the novelty factor wears off. Reason? The English corporate-media is obsessed with our national sport football (or soccer to you guys). It crowds out every other sport to just minimal press and TV coverage. This year's Wembley extravaganza wasn't even televised on terrestrial TV here - just an hour's highlights at midnight. What's the point of that? Last year the game was shown live on the BBC, with pretty good viewing numbers, so why not again this year? Just proves my point that this country is obsessed with soccer. That's why NFL Europe crumbled. The UK media won't get behind American Football. The most disturbing thing of all - and here's where I really agree with you - is I can see Goodell following the model of our Premiership soccer league, which is obsessed with revenue. Teams play at random times on random days for no apparent reason - qualifiers, tie-breaks, second-leg replays??!! Seasons don't seem to have beginnings or ends. Teams are unrecognizable from constant player movement, different uniforms (throwback jerseys anyone?); Brands and sponsors are taking over (stadiums being renamed anyone?); I could go on... Maybe Goodell is listening too much to the Glazers? Clearly I'm not a soccer fan. But even I know the game today is far removed from the one when I was a boy. Nostalgia is sometimes misplaced, but I don't think there's any doubt that the Premiership is a business first; sport second. It belongs to big corporations and networks, not fans. Take this as a warning NFL fans: We lost our national sport to the money men years ago. Don't lose yours!

Quick Links

Poll

Will Brady Quinn beat out Kyle Orton as Broncos' Week One starting QB?


Pro Football Weekly, LLC. | 302 Saunders Rd. Suite 100 Riverwoods, IL 60015 | (847) 940-1100
Copyrighted © 1998- by Pro Football Weekly, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.
Designated portions of this site © by STATS LLC. and/or Associated Press. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC and/or Associated Press is strictly prohibited.
Powered by Django