Not Registered?

Patriots steal another from Oakland

Photos

Loading...

  • derrick-burgess-raider-closeup-080609
    Former Raiders DE Derrick Burgess

Related Stories

Brady not worried about contract from Patriots

Posted Feb. 06, 2010 @ 6:24 p.m.

Patriots place Welker on injured reserve

Posted Jan. 06, 2010 @ 4:03 p.m.

Belichick: Bad field contributed to Welker's injury

Posted Jan. 05, 2010 @ 3:30 p.m.

Cable has yet to decide on quarterback

Posted Dec. 14, 2009 @ 5:43 p.m.

Patriots release safety Williams

Posted Aug. 25, 2009 @ 5:13 p.m.

Report: Broncos acquire OG Hochstein

Posted Aug. 25, 2009 @ 2:06 p.m.

Reports: Cable punched Raiders assistant

Posted Aug. 17, 2009 @ 5:22 p.m.

Raiders sign veteran CB Manning

Posted Aug. 16, 2009 @ 12:24 a.m.

Report: Raiders’ Barnes out 4-6 weeks

Posted Aug. 05, 2009 @ 6:48 p.m.
Posted Aug. 06, 2009 @ 7:36 p.m.
By Matt Sohn

In one of the more meaningful acquisitions since the draft, the Patriots sealed a trade with the Raiders for OLB-DE Derrick Burgess on Thursday. The Pats reportedly gave Oakland third- and fourth-round picks in the 2010 draft.

The two clubs had been conversing for months about Burgess, yet the Raiders' asking price was believed to have exceeded what the Patriots were willing to part with.

Burgess has been an impact player in Oakland, securing 38½ sacks in four seasons. He spent his first four seasons with the Eagles, primarily as a reserve.

Burgess, who has spent his career at defensive end, will be shifted to outside linebacker in New England. The Pats have needed help at the position since trading stalwart OLB Mike Vrabel to Kansas City prior to the draft.

The PFW spin

An unmitigated boon for the boys in the Boston. That's the immediate conclusion to arrive at in the aftermath of a trade that substantially upgrades their biggest problem area. There's a reason that New England had been prodding the Raiders for months and why they courted Jason Taylor so fervently — the club needed help on the edge.

Prior to Thursday's acquisition, the team was faced with the prospect of starting lightly regarded career reserve Pierre Woods opposite Adalius Thomas. It's not that Woods is a categorically bad player; it's just that the former undrafted free agent has little pedigree to prove he's worthy of starting for a club that has legitimate Super Bowl aspirations.

Burgess struggled with injuries last season, yet has unquestioned skill as a pass rusher, which is precisely what the Pats need him for. After finishing second to the Giants in team sacks in 2007, the club regressed considerably in '08. While Burgess is old by NFL standards — he'll turn 31 Wednesday — he's not that old by the Patriots' standards. Throughout his tenure in New England, Bill Belichick has coaxed the max out of supposedly declining veteran newcomers time and again.

If Burgess can come close to replicating the success of the last Raider the Pats traded for, they'll be more than content. That'd be Randy Moss, who's been considerably more than decent in two seasons in Foxborough.

 

Kickoff is coming! Be sure to buy copies of the Pro Football Weekly/Yahoo! Sports 2009 NFL preview magazine, as well as the Pro Football Weekly/Yahoo! Sports Fantasy Football Guide 2009, both of which are now available at bookstores, newsstands and retail outlets where magazines are sold. Or order your copies online at PFWStore.com.

Comments (2)

Login!

Not Registered?

or Register!

Steve
Actually,It's not 3rd & 5th round picks in 2011....It's 3rd & 4th round picks in 2010...that is in April...PLus Oakland has alot of young talent in DE position waiting to show what they can do...And Oakland's worst trade ever made in thier history was giving Vikings a #1 for Moss...When Patriots start declining,he will quit,because he will drop everything because he would be "not happy"...still want a paycheck though...Oakland did well in recieving a #4 round pick for him,they could have just released him to get rid of dead weight and trouble maker on team...Tuck rule is where they were screwed,Maybe Brady can Tuck his knee backwards again in week 1 this year.....Thank you all for the time and support.
xobn1050
This is just like always, all the media that covers football tries to put a negative spin on every Oakland transaction. Burgess didn't want to play in Oakland so why not try to trade him for the best deal. More than what he would have produced if he was retained. He was going to be only a pass rush specialist at best because of his liabilities as a run defender. Would like to see what he does as a OLB, when he has to cover and run defend. Not all the time he will be pass rushing.

Quick Links

Poll

What was the most important play for the Saints in Super Bowl XLIV?


Pro Football Weekly, LLC. | 302 Saunders Rd. Suite 100 Riverwoods, IL 60015 | (847) 940-1100
Copyrighted © 1998- by Pro Football Weekly, LLC. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is strictly prohibited.
Designated portions of this site © by STATS LLC. and/or Associated Press. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC and/or Associated Press is strictly prohibited.
Powered by Django